SQLServer如何使用UNION代替OR提升查询性能

53次阅读
没有评论

共计 9039 个字符,预计需要花费 23 分钟才能阅读完成。

自动写代码机器人,免费开通

这篇文章主要介绍 SQLServer 如何使用 UNION 代替 OR 提升查询性能,文中介绍的非常详细,具有一定的参考价值,感兴趣的小伙伴们一定要看完!

SQLServer 数据库查询的过程中,通过对 SQL 语句的优化来提高 SQL 查询的性能。下面丸趣 TV 丸趣 TV 小编来讲解下 SQLServer 怎么使用 UNION 代替 OR 提升查询性能?

SQLServer 怎么使用 UNION 代替 OR 提升查询性能

SQL settimingonSQL setautotraceonSQL selectcount(*)rowcount_lhy2fromswgl_ddjbxxt3wheret。fzgs_dm= 001085 4and(t。lrr_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e orexists5(selecty。kh_id6fromkhgl_khywdlxxy7wherey。kh_id=t。kh_id8andy。sskhjl_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e)or9t。kpr_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e )10andt。xjbz= 9999 11andt。FROMNBGL1= 0 SQL setline300SQL /ROWCOUNT_LHY————————60 已用时间:00:00:20。53 执行计划——————————————————————————————————————Planhashvalue:1217125969——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————|Id|Operation|Name|Rows|Bytes|Cost(%CPU)|Time|——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————|0|SELECTSTATEMENT||1|86|28048(1)|00:05:37||1|SORTAGGREGATE||1|86||||*2|FILTER|||||||*3|TABLEACCESSFULL|SWGL_DDJBXX|5926|497K|28048(1)|00:05:37||*4|TABLEACCESSBYINDEXROWID|KHGL_KHYWDLXX|1|57|5(0)|00:00:01||*5|INDEXRANGESCAN|IDX_KHGL_KHYWDLXX_KHID|1||3(0)|00:00:01|————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————PredicateInformation(identifiedbyoperationid):——————————————————————————————————-2-filter(T。LRR_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e OR T。KPR_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e OREXISTS(SELECT0FROM KHGL_KHYWDLXX Y WHERE Y。KH_ID =:B1AND Y。SSKHJL_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e))3-filter(T。FROMNBGL1 = 0 AND T。XJBZ = 9999 AND T。FZGS_DM = 001085)4-filter(Y。SSKHJL_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e)5-access(Y。KH_ID =:B1) 统计信息——————————————————————————————————————0recursivecalls0dbblockgets804560consistentgets71127physicalreads0redosize516bytessentviaSQL*Nettoclient469bytesreceivedviaSQL*Netfromclient2SQL*Netroundtripsto/fromclient0sorts(memory)0sorts(disk)1rowsprocessed

用 UNION 代替 OR 对其进行优化后的代码如下:

SQL selectcount(*)2from(select*3fromswgl_ddjbxxt4wheret。lrr_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e 5andt。fzgs_dm= 001085 6andt。xjbz= 9999 7andt。FROMNBGL1= 0 8union9select*10fromswgl_ddjbxxt11wheret。kpr_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e 12andt。fzgs_dm= 001085 13andt。xjbz= 9999 14andt。FROMNBGL1= 0 15union16select*17fromswgl_ddjbxxt18whereexists19(selecty。kh_id20fromkhgl_khywdlxxy21wherey。kh_id=t。kh_id22andy。sskhjl_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e)23andt。fzgs_dm= 001085 24andt。xjbz= 9999 25andt。FROMNBGL1= 0 COUNT(*)————————60 已用时间:00:00:06。89 执行计划——————————————————————————————————————Planhashvalue:3846872744—————————————————————————————————————————————————————–|Id|Operation|Name|Rows|Bytes|TempSpc|Cost(%CPU)|Time|———————————————————————————————————————–|0|SELECTSTATEMENT||1|||52263(1)|00:10:28||1|SORTAGGREGATE||1||||||2|VIEW||5996|||52263(1)|00:10:28||3|SORTUNIQUE||5996|2238K|6344K|52263(47)|00:10:28||4|UNION-ALL||||||||*5|TABLEACCESSFULL|SWGL_DDJBXX|59|19234||28037(1)|00:05:37||*6|TABLEACCESSBYINDEXROWID|SWGL_DDJBXX|10|3260||1209(1)|00:00:15||*7|INDEXRANGESCAN|IDX_SWGL_DDJBXX_KPRDM|4748|||34(0)|00:00:01||*8|TABLEACCESSBYINDEXROWID|SWGL_DDJBXX|1|326||5(0)|00:00:01||9|NESTEDLOOPS||5927|2216K||22527(1)|00:04:31||10|SORTUNIQUE||10165|565K||1916(1)|00:00:23||11|TABLEACCESSBYINDEXROWID|KHGL_KHYWDLXX|10165|565K||1916(1)|00:00:23||*12|INDEXRANGESCAN|IDX_KHGL_KHYWDLXX_SSKHJL|10165|||111(0)|00:00:02||*13|INDEXRANGESCAN|IDX_SWGL_DDJBXX_KHID|2|||2(0)|00:00:01|———————————————————————————————————————–PredicateInformation(identifiedbyoperationid):—————————————————5-filter(T。LRR_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e AND T。FROMNBGL1 = 0 AND T。XJBZ = 9999 AND T。FZGS_DM = 001085)6-filter(T。FROMNBGL1 = 0 AND T。XJBZ = 9999 AND T。FZGS_DM = 001085)7-access(T。KPR_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e)8-filter(T。FROMNBGL1 = 0 AND T。XJBZ = 9999 AND T。FZGS_DM = 001085)12-access(Y。SSKHJL_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e)13-access(Y。KH_ID = T。KH_ID) 统计信息 ———————————————————-1recursivecalls0dbblockgets128422consistentgets10308physicalreads0redosize512bytessentviaSQL*Nettoclient469bytesreceivedviaSQL*Netfromclient2SQL*Netroundtripsto/fromclient2sorts(memory)0sorts(disk)1rowsprocessed

SQL 改写之后,执行时间由原来的 20 秒下降到 6 秒,逻辑读由 804560 降低到 128422,性能还是有很大提升的,到了这里优化还没完,可以创建一个组合索引进一步优化。

createindexidxonswgl_ddjbxx(fzgs_dm,xjbz,FROMNBGL1);

SQLServer 怎么使用 UNION 代替 OR 提升查询性能

创建索引之后,原始的 SQL 执行时间,执行计划,统计信息如下:

SQL selectcount(*)rowcount_lhy2fromswgl_ddjbxxt3wheret。fzgs_dm= 001085 4and(t。lrr_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e orexists5(selecty。kh_id6fromkhgl_khywdlxxy7wherey。kh_id=t。kh_id8andy。sskhjl_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e)or9t。kpr_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e )10andt。xjbz= 9999 11andt。FROMNBGL1= 0 ROWCOUNT_LHY————60 已用时间:00:00:02。96 执行计划 ———————————————————-Planhashvalue:3049366449——————————————————————————————————–|Id|Operation|Name|Rows|Bytes|Cost(%CPU)|Time|——————————————————————————————————–|0|SELECTSTATEMENT||1|86|506(0)|00:00:07||1|SORTAGGREGATE||1|86||||*2|FILTER|||||||3|TABLEACCESSBYINDEXROWID|SWGL_DDJBXX|5926|497K|506(0)|00:00:07||*4|INDEXRANGESCAN|IDX|2370||12(0)|00:00:01||*5|TABLEACCESSBYINDEXROWID|KHGL_KHYWDLXX|1|57|5(0)|00:00:01||*6|INDEXRANGESCAN|IDX_KHGL_KHYWDLXX_KHID|1||3(0)|00:00:01|——————————————————————————————————–PredicateInformation(identifiedbyoperationid):—————————————————2-filter(T。LRR_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e OR T。KPR_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e OREXISTS(SELECT0FROM KHGL_KHYWDLXX Y WHERE Y。KH_ID =:B1AND Y。SSKHJL_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e))4-access(T。FZGS_DM = 001085 AND T。XJBZ = 9999 AND T。FROMNBGL1 = 0)5-filter(Y。SSKHJL_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e)6-access(Y。KH_ID =:B1) 统计信息 ———————————————————-1recursivecalls0dbblockgets702767consistentgets0physicalreads0redosize516bytessentviaSQL*Nettoclient469bytesreceivedviaSQL*Netfromclient2SQL*Netroundtripsto/fromclient0sorts(memory)0sorts(disk)1rowsprocessed

改写的 SQL:

SQL selectcount(*)2from(select*3fromswgl_ddjbxxt4wheret。lrr_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e 5andt。fzgs_dm= 001085 6andt。xjbz= 9999 7andt。FROMNBGL1= 0 8union9select*10fromswgl_ddjbxxt11wheret。kpr_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e 12andt。fzgs_dm= 001085 13andt。xjbz= 9999 14andt。FROMNBGL1= 0 15union16select*17fromswgl_ddjbxxt18whereexists19(selecty。kh_id20fromkhgl_khywdlxxy21wherey。kh_id=t。kh_id22andy。sskhjl_dm= e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e)23andt。fzgs_dm= 001085 24andt。xjbz= 9999 25andt。FROMNBGL1= 0 COUNT(*)———-60 已用时间:00:00:00。53 执行计划 ———————————————————-Planhashvalue:2947849958————————————————————————————————————————-|Id|Operation|Name|Rows|Bytes|TempSpc|Cost(%CPU)|Time|————————————————————————————————————————-|0|SELECTSTATEMENT||1|||3469(1)|00:00:42||1|SORTAGGREGATE||1||||||2|VIEW||5995|||3469(1)|00:00:42||3|SORTUNIQUE||5995|2238K|4760K|3469(86)|00:00:42||4|UNION-ALL||||||||*5|TABLEACCESSBYINDEXROWID|SWGL_DDJBXX|59|19234||506(0)|00:00:07||*6|INDEXRANGESCAN|IDX|2370|||12(0)|00:00:01||7|TABLEACCESSBYINDEXROWID|SWGL_DDJBXX|10|3260||50(0)|00:00:01||8|BITMAPCONVERSIONTOROWIDS||||||||9|BITMAPAND||||||||10|BITMAPCONVERSIONFROMROWIDS||||||||*11|INDEXRANGESCAN|IDX|2370|||12(0)|00:00:01||12|BITMAPCONVERSIONFROMROWIDS||||||||*13|INDEXRANGESCAN|IDX_SWGL_DDJBXX_KPRDM|2370|||34(0)|00:00:01||*14|HASHJOINRIGHTSEMI||5926|2216K||2423(1)|00:00:30||15|TABLEACCESSBYINDEXROWID|KHGL_KHYWDLXX|10165|565K||1916(1)|00:00:23||*16|INDEXRANGESCAN|IDX_KHGL_KHYWDLXX_SSKHJL|10165|||111(0)|00:00:02||17|TABLEACCESSBYINDEXROWID|SWGL_DDJBXX|5926|1886K||506(0)|00:00:07||*18|INDEXRANGESCAN|IDX|2370|||12(0)|00:00:01|————————————————————————————————————————-PredicateInformation(identifiedbyoperationid):—————————————————5-filter(T。LRR_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e)6-access(T。FZGS_DM = 001085 AND T。XJBZ = 9999 AND T。FROMNBGL1 = 0)11-access(T。FZGS_DM = 001085 AND T。XJBZ = 9999 AND T。FROMNBGL1 = 0)filter(T。FROMNBGL1 = 0 AND T。XJBZ = 9999 AND T。FZGS_DM = 001085)13-access(T。KPR_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e)14-access(Y。KH_ID = T。KH_ID)16-access(Y。SSKHJL_DM = e90e3fe4237c4af988477329c7f2059e)18-access(T。FZGS_DM = 001085 AND T。XJBZ = 9999 AND T . FROMNBGL1 = 0) 统计信息 ———————————————————1recursivecalls0dbblockgets25628consistentgets0physicalreads0redosize512bytessentviaSQL*Nettoclient469bytesreceivedviaSQL*Netfromclient2SQL*Netroundtripsto/fromclient1sorts(memory)0sorts(disk)1rowsprocessed。

以上是“SQLServer 如何使用 UNION 代替 OR 提升查询性能”这篇文章的所有内容,感谢各位的阅读!希望分享的内容对大家有帮助,更多相关知识,欢迎关注丸趣 TV 行业资讯频道!

向 AI 问一下细节

正文完
 
丸趣
版权声明:本站原创文章,由 丸趣 2023-12-04发表,共计9039字。
转载说明:除特殊说明外本站除技术相关以外文章皆由网络搜集发布,转载请注明出处。
评论(没有评论)